home

    

 

Fatigue Technology Inc. performed extensive fatigue testing using the specimen configuration shown in Figure 1 to determine the likely fatigue life improvement factor associated with the TCTO-2060 repair concept. Specifically, baseline specimens were run, and repaired specimens were cycled to failure. Failure was defined as a crack growing into the thickness-change radius. The results of each of the test specimens are included in Table 1 and graphed in Figure 2.

FIGURE 1

The test data indicates that the ForceTec repair will greatly increase the life of the joint at access panel location #3421. This data should only be used for trends and not for actual life expectancy comparisons.

 

Life to crack detection

The fatigue life of the specimens can be compared to time to first crack observation. The initial cracks were typically found when they were very small (less than 0.010-inch) except on F16HPFTCX6 (first observation at 0.022-inch). In the baseline specimen (F16HPBASE2) the first crack initiated from a fastener hole. In the specimens prepared with FtCx retainers, the initial crack started from the edge of the cut-out. The time to first observation was a minimum of 2.8 times later for the reworked specimens than for the baseline specimen.

Life to specimen failure

The time to first ligament failure is another method of looking at the data. In the baseline specimen, the crack growing from fastener hole #28 grew towards the edge and the web resulting in ligament failure and web failure occurring essentially simultaneously. In the rework specimens, the crack grew much more slowly away from the cutout than to it. NOTE: In all three repair specimen configurations: FtCx at start of test, FtCx after 2000 EFH, and the oversize FtCx configurations; had similar fatigue lives to crack initiation and ligament failure. The time to ligament failure on the New Production (no rivet holes) specimen was significantly higher than the other specimens.

The end of test was determined as a crack that exceeded the length of the land (web) area and was visible outside the door area on the front of the specimen (approximately 1.1 inches long). This size of crack could cause "functional impairment" (a fuel leak on the aircraft). The rework specimens had cracks located away from the test area, typically on the specimen at a stiffener attachment fastener, start before land failure occurred. In these specimens the end of test point is conservative for the comparison to web failure with the baseline specimen. The minimum time to land failure of a specimen prepared with FtCx retainers was 3.1 times that of the baseline specimen.

 

Table 1

Test Summary with Maximum Spectrum Load at 46.78 kip

Specimen

EFH to First Crack Observation

Crack

Location / Size (inch)

EFH to First Ligament Failure

Crack

Location / Size (inch)

EFH to Test Completion

Crack

Location / Size (inch)

Baseline

5,000

Hole 28 – Fastener / 0.04

NR

NR

7,500

  • Hole 28 – Fastener / 0.97-inch
  • Hole 7 / 0.40 (lig)

FtCx Repair

14,000

Edge to Hole 7 – Upper Rivet / NR

(indication only)

16,500

Hole 7 – Upper Rivet (A) / 0.27

23,636

  • Hole 7 Rivet (A) & Fast. / 0.94
  • Stringer Fastener / 0.23
  • Hole 28 (A) / Edge Lig.(NR)
  • Hole 29 (A) / 0.40

FtCx New Production

17,500

Edge towards Hole 6 / NR

(indication only)

31,003

Hole 29 – Fastener / 0.40

44,000

  • Longeron Fastener / 0.42
  • Hole 6 (F) / 0.38
  • Hole 29 (F) / 0.72

Pre-age, then repair

18,000

Edge toward Hole 7(A) / 0.22

19,000

Hole 7 – Fastener / 0.38

29,500

  • Longeron Fastener / approx. 1.25
  • Hole 7 (F) / Edge Lig. 0.38
  • Hole 28 (F) / Edge Lig. 0.77

Maximum oversize

13,500

Edge toward Hole 7/ 0.069

15,500

Hole 7 – Upper Rivet (A) / 0.26

27,000

  • Hole 28 (B) / 0.22 toward web
  • Hole 28 (A) / 0.54 total from edge to fastener hole
  • Multiple cracks around fastener and rivet holes at location 6.

 

FIGURE 2

Summary

This test program was performed to assess the effectiveness of FTI’s sealed ForceTec (FtCx) nut plate repair in the Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems (LMTAS) designed specimen. This specimen effectively represented the most highly stressed, and therefore most fatigue critical area of the upper fuselage skin in the F-16 aircraft. This test is supplemental (and correlates) to the testing LMTAS has performed to qualify ECP-1966, and earlier versions of TCTO-2060 for the USAF. Based on testing, the best repair option for the highest strain area at access panel #3406 was to install a "lawnmower blade" shaped doubler, and perform the ForceTec repair to the remaining access covers in the 16B5301, 16B5303 and 16B5304 skins. With the doubler attached, the area of highest strain is moved from access panel #3406 to access panel #3421, with 13% lower strains.

The results of this program show that with the addition of the doubler, FtCx retainers should provide significant fatigue life improvement for the F-16 upper fuselage skin.